ABI Policy and GuidelinesC++ABIversiondynamicsharedcompatibilityThe C++ Interface
C++ applications often depend on specific language support
routines, say for throwing exceptions, or catching exceptions, and
perhaps also depend on features in the C++ Standard Library.
The C++ Standard Library has many include files, types defined in
those include files, specific named functions, and other
behavior. The text of these behaviors, as written in source include
files, is called the Application Programing Interface, or API.
Furthermore, C++ source that is compiled into object files is
transformed by the compiler: it arranges objects with specific
alignment and in a particular layout, mangling names according to a
well-defined algorithm, has specific arrangements for the support of
virtual functions, etc. These details are defined as the compiler
Application Binary Interface, or ABI. From GCC version 3 onwards the
GNU C++ compiler uses an industry-standard C++ ABI, the
Itanium C++ ABI.
The GNU C++ compiler, g++, has a compiler command line option to
switch between various different C++ ABIs. This explicit version
switch is the flag -fabi-version. In addition, some
g++ command line options may change the ABI as a side-effect of
use. Such flags include -fpack-struct and
-fno-exceptions, but include others: see the complete
list in the GCC manual under the heading Options
for Code Generation Conventions.
The configure options used when building a specific libstdc++
version may also impact the resulting library ABI. The available
configure options, and their impact on the library ABI, are
documented
here.
Putting all of these ideas together results in the C++ Standard
Library ABI, which is the compilation of a given library API by a
given compiler ABI. In a nutshell:
library API + compiler ABI = library ABI
The library ABI is mostly of interest for end-users who have
unresolved symbols and are linking dynamically to the C++ Standard
library, and who thus must be careful to compile their application
with a compiler that is compatible with the available C++ Standard
library binary. In this case, compatible is defined with the equation
above: given an application compiled with a given compiler ABI and
library API, it will work correctly with a Standard C++ Library
created with the same constraints.
To use a specific version of the C++ ABI, one must use a
corresponding GNU C++ toolchain (i.e., g++ and libstdc++) that
implements the C++ ABI in question.
Versioning The C++ interface has evolved throughout the history of the GNU
C++ toolchain. With each release, various details have been changed so
as to give distinct versions to the C++ interface.
GoalsExtending existing, stable ABIs. Versioning gives subsequent
releases of library binaries the ability to add new symbols and add
functionality, all the while retaining compatibility with the previous
releases in the series. Thus, program binaries linked with the initial
release of a library binary will still run correctly if the library
binary is replaced by carefully-managed subsequent library
binaries. This is called forward compatibility.
The reverse (backwards compatibility) is not true. It is not possible
to take program binaries linked with the latest version of a library
binary in a release series (with additional symbols added), substitute
in the initial release of the library binary, and remain link
compatible.
Allows multiple, incompatible ABIs to coexist at the same time.
History
How can this complexity be managed? What does C++ versioning mean?
Because library and compiler changes often make binaries compiled
with one version of the GNU tools incompatible with binaries
compiled with other (either newer or older) versions of the same GNU
tools, specific techniques are used to make managing this complexity
easier.
The following techniques are used:
Release versioning on the libgcc_s.so binary. This is implemented via file names and the ELF
DT_SONAME mechanism (at least on ELF
systems). It is versioned as follows:
GCC 3.x: libgcc_s.so.1GCC 4.x: libgcc_s.so.1For m68k-linux the versions differ as follows: GCC 3.4, GCC 4.x: libgcc_s.so.1
when configuring --with-sjlj-exceptions, or
libgcc_s.so.2 For hppa-linux the versions differ as follows: GCC 3.4, GCC 4.[0-1]: either libgcc_s.so.1
when configuring --with-sjlj-exceptions, or
libgcc_s.so.2 GCC 4.[2-7]: either libgcc_s.so.3 when configuring
--with-sjlj-exceptions) or libgcc_s.so.4
Symbol versioning on the libgcc_s.so binary.It is versioned with the following labels and version
definitions, where the version definition is the maximum for a
particular release. Labels are cumulative. If a particular release
is not listed, it has the same version labels as the preceding
release.This corresponds to the mapfile: gcc/libgcc-std.verGCC 3.0.0: GCC_3.0GCC 3.3.0: GCC_3.3GCC 3.3.1: GCC_3.3.1GCC 3.3.2: GCC_3.3.2GCC 3.3.4: GCC_3.3.4GCC 3.4.0: GCC_3.4GCC 3.4.2: GCC_3.4.2GCC 3.4.4: GCC_3.4.4GCC 4.0.0: GCC_4.0.0GCC 4.1.0: GCC_4.1.0GCC 4.2.0: GCC_4.2.0GCC 4.3.0: GCC_4.3.0GCC 4.4.0: GCC_4.4.0GCC 4.5.0: GCC_4.5.0GCC 4.6.0: GCC_4.6.0GCC 4.7.0: GCC_4.7.0GCC 4.8.0: GCC_4.8.0
Release versioning on the libstdc++.so binary, implemented in
the same way as the libgcc_s.so binary above. Listed is the
filename: DT_SONAME can be deduced from
the filename by removing the last two period-delimited numbers. For
example, filename libstdc++.so.5.0.4
corresponds to a DT_SONAME of
libstdc++.so.5. Binaries with equivalent
DT_SONAMEs are forward-compatibile: in
the table below, releases incompatible with the previous
one are explicitly noted.
If a particular release is not listed, its libstdc++.so binary
has the same filename and DT_SONAME as the
preceding release.
It is versioned as follows:
GCC 3.0.0: libstdc++.so.3.0.0GCC 3.0.1: libstdc++.so.3.0.1GCC 3.0.2: libstdc++.so.3.0.2GCC 3.0.3: libstdc++.so.3.0.2 (See Note 1)GCC 3.0.4: libstdc++.so.3.0.4GCC 3.1.0: libstdc++.so.4.0.0 (Incompatible with previous)GCC 3.1.1: libstdc++.so.4.0.1GCC 3.2.0: libstdc++.so.5.0.0 (Incompatible with previous)GCC 3.2.1: libstdc++.so.5.0.1GCC 3.2.2: libstdc++.so.5.0.2GCC 3.2.3: libstdc++.so.5.0.3 (See Note 2)GCC 3.3.0: libstdc++.so.5.0.4GCC 3.3.1: libstdc++.so.5.0.5GCC 3.4.0: libstdc++.so.6.0.0 (Incompatible with previous)GCC 3.4.1: libstdc++.so.6.0.1GCC 3.4.2: libstdc++.so.6.0.2GCC 3.4.3: libstdc++.so.6.0.3GCC 4.0.0: libstdc++.so.6.0.4GCC 4.0.1: libstdc++.so.6.0.5GCC 4.0.2: libstdc++.so.6.0.6GCC 4.0.3: libstdc++.so.6.0.7GCC 4.1.0: libstdc++.so.6.0.7GCC 4.1.1: libstdc++.so.6.0.8GCC 4.2.0: libstdc++.so.6.0.9GCC 4.2.1: libstdc++.so.6.0.9 (See Note 3)GCC 4.2.2: libstdc++.so.6.0.9GCC 4.3.0: libstdc++.so.6.0.10GCC 4.4.0: libstdc++.so.6.0.11GCC 4.4.1: libstdc++.so.6.0.12GCC 4.4.2: libstdc++.so.6.0.13GCC 4.5.0: libstdc++.so.6.0.14GCC 4.6.0: libstdc++.so.6.0.15GCC 4.6.1: libstdc++.so.6.0.16GCC 4.7.0: libstdc++.so.6.0.17GCC 4.8.0: libstdc++.so.6.0.18GCC 4.8.3: libstdc++.so.6.0.19GCC 4.9.0: libstdc++.so.6.0.20GCC 5.1.0: libstdc++.so.6.0.21GCC 6.1.0: libstdc++.so.6.0.22GCC 7.1.0: libstdc++.so.6.0.23GCC 7.2.0: libstdc++.so.6.0.24GCC 8.0.0: libstdc++.so.6.0.25GCC 9.1.0: libstdc++.so.6.0.26GCC 9.2.0: libstdc++.so.6.0.27GCC 9.3.0: libstdc++.so.6.0.28
Note 1: Error should be libstdc++.so.3.0.3.
Note 2: Not strictly required.
Note 3: This release (but not previous or subsequent) has one
known incompatibility, see 33678
in the GCC bug database.
Symbol versioning on the libstdc++.so binary.mapfile: libstdc++-v3/config/abi/pre/gnu.verIt is versioned with the following labels and version
definitions, where the version definition is the maximum for a
particular release. Note, only symbols which are newly introduced
will use the maximum version definition. Thus, for release series
with the same label, but incremented version definitions, the later
release has both versions. (An example of this would be the
GCC 3.2.1 release, which has GLIBCPP_3.2.1 for new symbols and
GLIBCPP_3.2 for symbols that were introduced in the GCC 3.2.0
release.) If a particular release is not listed, it has the same
version labels as the preceding release.
GCC 3.0.0: (Error, not versioned)GCC 3.0.1: (Error, not versioned)GCC 3.0.2: (Error, not versioned)GCC 3.0.3: (Error, not versioned)GCC 3.0.4: (Error, not versioned)GCC 3.1.0: GLIBCPP_3.1, CXXABI_1GCC 3.1.1: GLIBCPP_3.1, CXXABI_1GCC 3.2.0: GLIBCPP_3.2, CXXABI_1.2GCC 3.2.1: GLIBCPP_3.2.1, CXXABI_1.2GCC 3.2.2: GLIBCPP_3.2.2, CXXABI_1.2GCC 3.2.3: GLIBCPP_3.2.2, CXXABI_1.2GCC 3.3.0: GLIBCPP_3.2.2, CXXABI_1.2.1GCC 3.3.1: GLIBCPP_3.2.3, CXXABI_1.2.1GCC 3.3.2: GLIBCPP_3.2.3, CXXABI_1.2.1GCC 3.3.3: GLIBCPP_3.2.3, CXXABI_1.2.1GCC 3.4.0: GLIBCXX_3.4, CXXABI_1.3GCC 3.4.1: GLIBCXX_3.4.1, CXXABI_1.3GCC 3.4.2: GLIBCXX_3.4.2GCC 3.4.3: GLIBCXX_3.4.3GCC 4.0.0: GLIBCXX_3.4.4, CXXABI_1.3.1GCC 4.0.1: GLIBCXX_3.4.5GCC 4.0.2: GLIBCXX_3.4.6GCC 4.0.3: GLIBCXX_3.4.7GCC 4.1.1: GLIBCXX_3.4.8GCC 4.2.0: GLIBCXX_3.4.9GCC 4.3.0: GLIBCXX_3.4.10, CXXABI_1.3.2GCC 4.4.0: GLIBCXX_3.4.11, CXXABI_1.3.3GCC 4.4.1: GLIBCXX_3.4.12, CXXABI_1.3.3GCC 4.4.2: GLIBCXX_3.4.13, CXXABI_1.3.3GCC 4.5.0: GLIBCXX_3.4.14, CXXABI_1.3.4GCC 4.6.0: GLIBCXX_3.4.15, CXXABI_1.3.5GCC 4.6.1: GLIBCXX_3.4.16, CXXABI_1.3.5GCC 4.7.0: GLIBCXX_3.4.17, CXXABI_1.3.6GCC 4.8.0: GLIBCXX_3.4.18, CXXABI_1.3.7GCC 4.8.3: GLIBCXX_3.4.19, CXXABI_1.3.7GCC 4.9.0: GLIBCXX_3.4.20, CXXABI_1.3.8GCC 5.1.0: GLIBCXX_3.4.21, CXXABI_1.3.9GCC 6.1.0: GLIBCXX_3.4.22, CXXABI_1.3.10GCC 7.1.0: GLIBCXX_3.4.23, CXXABI_1.3.11GCC 7.2.0: GLIBCXX_3.4.24, CXXABI_1.3.11GCC 8.0.0: GLIBCXX_3.4.25, CXXABI_1.3.11GCC 9.0.0: GLIBCXX_3.4.26, CXXABI_1.3.11Incremental bumping of a compiler pre-defined macro,
__GXX_ABI_VERSION. This macro is defined as the version of the
compiler v3 ABI, with g++ 3.0 being version 100. This macro will
be automatically defined whenever g++ is used (the curious can
test this by invoking g++ with the '-v' flag.)
This macro was defined in the file "lang-specs.h" in the gcc/cp directory.
Later versions defined it in "c-common.c" in the gcc directory, and from
G++ 3.4 it is defined in c-cppbuiltin.c and its value determined by the
'-fabi-version' command line option.
It is versioned as follows, where 'n' is given by '-fabi-version=n':
GCC 3.0: 100GCC 3.1: 100 (Error, should be 101)GCC 3.2: 102GCC 3.3: 102GCC 3.4, GCC 4.x: 102 (when n=1)GCC 3.4, GCC 4.x: 1000 + n (when n>1) GCC 3.4, GCC 4.x: 999999 (when n=0)Changes to the default compiler option for
-fabi-version.
It is versioned as follows:
GCC 3.0: (Error, not versioned) GCC 3.1: (Error, not versioned) GCC 3.2: -fabi-version=1GCC 3.3: -fabi-version=1GCC 3.4, GCC 4.x: -fabi-version=2(Incompatible with previous)GCC 5 and higher: -fabi-version=0(See GCC manual for meaning)Incremental bumping of a library pre-defined macro. For releases
before 3.4.0, the macro is __GLIBCPP__. For later
releases, it's __GLIBCXX__. (The libstdc++ project
generously changed from CPP to CXX throughout its source to allow the
"C" pre-processor the CPP macro namespace.) These macros are defined
as the date the library was released, in compressed ISO date format,
as an integer constant.
This macro is defined in the file
c++config in the
libstdc++-v3/include/bits
directory. Up to GCC 4.1.0, it was
changed every night by an automated script. Since GCC 4.1.0 it is set
during configuration to the same value as
gcc/DATESTAMP, so for an official release its value
is the same as the date of the release, which is given in the GCC Release
Timeline.
This macro can be used in code to detect whether the C++ Standard Library
implementation in use is libstdc++, but is not useful for detecting the
libstdc++ version, nor whether particular features are supported.
The macro value might be a date after a feature was added to the
development trunk, but the release could be from an older branch without
the feature. For example, in the 5.4.0 release the macro has the value
20160603 which is greater than the
20160427 value of the macro in the 6.1.0 release,
but there are features supported in the 6.1.0 release that are not
supported in the 5.4.0 release.
You also can't test for the exact values listed below to try and
identify a release, because a snapshot taken from the gcc-5-branch on
2016-04-27 would have the same value for the macro as the 6.1.0 release
despite being a different version.
Many GNU/Linux distributions build their GCC packages from snapshots, so
the macro can have dates that don't correspond to official releases.
It is versioned as follows:
GCC 3.0.0: 20010615GCC 3.0.1: 20010819GCC 3.0.2: 20011023GCC 3.0.3: 20011220GCC 3.0.4: 20020220GCC 3.1.0: 20020514GCC 3.1.1: 20020725GCC 3.2.0: 20020814GCC 3.2.1: 20021119GCC 3.2.2: 20030205GCC 3.2.3: 20030422GCC 3.3.0: 20030513GCC 3.3.1: 20030804GCC 3.3.2: 20031016GCC 3.3.3: 20040214GCC 3.4.0: 20040419GCC 3.4.1: 20040701GCC 3.4.2: 20040906GCC 3.4.3: 20041105GCC 3.4.4: 20050519GCC 3.4.5: 20051201GCC 3.4.6: 20060306GCC 4.0.0: 20050421GCC 4.0.1: 20050707GCC 4.0.2: 20050921GCC 4.0.3: 20060309
GCC 4.1.0 and later: the GCC release date, as shown in the
GCC
Release Timeline
Since GCC 7, incremental bumping of a library pre-defined macro,
_GLIBCXX_RELEASE. This macro is defined to the GCC
major version that the libstdc++ headers belong to, as an integer constant.
When compiling with GCC it has the same value as GCC's pre-defined
macro __GNUC__.
This macro can be used when libstdc++ is used with a non-GNU
compiler where __GNUC__ is not defined, or has a
different value that doesn't correspond to the libstdc++ version.
This macro is defined in the file
c++config in the
libstdc++-v3/include/bits
directory and is generated automatically by autoconf as part of the
configure-time generation of
config.h and subsequently
<bits/c++config.h>.
Historically, incremental bumping of a library pre-defined macro,
_GLIBCPP_VERSION. This macro was defined as the
released version of the library, as a string literal. This was only
implemented in GCC 3.1.0 releases and higher, and was deprecated in
3.4.x (where it was called _GLIBCXX_VERSION),
and is not defined in 4.0.0 and higher.
This macro is defined in the same file as
_GLIBCXX_RELEASE, described above.
It is versioned as follows:
GCC 3.0.0: "3.0.0"GCC 3.0.1: "3.0.0" (Error, should be "3.0.1")GCC 3.0.2: "3.0.0" (Error, should be "3.0.2")GCC 3.0.3: "3.0.0" (Error, should be "3.0.3")GCC 3.0.4: "3.0.0" (Error, should be "3.0.4")GCC 3.1.0: "3.1.0"GCC 3.1.1: "3.1.1"GCC 3.2.0: "3.2"GCC 3.2.1: "3.2.1"GCC 3.2.2: "3.2.2"GCC 3.2.3: "3.2.3"GCC 3.3.0: "3.3"GCC 3.3.1: "3.3.1"GCC 3.3.2: "3.3.2"GCC 3.3.3: "3.3.3"GCC 3.4: "version-unused"GCC 4 and later: not defined
Matching each specific C++ compiler release to a specific set of
C++ include files. This is only implemented in GCC 3.1.1 releases
and higher.
All C++ includes are installed in
include/c++, then nested in a
directory hierarchy corresponding to the C++ compiler's released
version. This version corresponds to the variable "gcc_version" in
"libstdc++-v3/acinclude.m4," and more details can be found in that
file's macro GLIBCXX_CONFIGURE (GLIBCPP_CONFIGURE before GCC 3.4.0).
C++ includes are versioned as follows:
GCC 3.0.0: include/g++-v3GCC 3.0.1: include/g++-v3GCC 3.0.2: include/g++-v3GCC 3.0.3: include/g++-v3GCC 3.0.4: include/g++-v3GCC 3.1.0: include/g++-v3GCC 3.1.1: include/c++/3.1.1GCC 3.2.0: include/c++/3.2GCC 3.2.1: include/c++/3.2.1GCC 3.2.2: include/c++/3.2.2GCC 3.2.3: include/c++/3.2.3GCC 3.3.0: include/c++/3.3GCC 3.3.1: include/c++/3.3.1GCC 3.3.2: include/c++/3.3.2GCC 3.3.3: include/c++/3.3.3GCC 3.4.x: include/c++/3.4.xGCC 4.x.y: include/c++/4.x.yGCC 5.x.0: include/c++/5.x.0GCC 6.x.0: include/c++/6.x.0GCC 7.x.0: include/c++/7.x.0GCC 8.x.0: include/c++/8.x.0
Taken together, these techniques can accurately specify interface
and implementation changes in the GNU C++ tools themselves. Used
properly, they allow both the GNU C++ tools implementation, and
programs using them, an evolving yet controlled development that
maintains backward compatibility.
Prerequisites
Minimum environment that supports a versioned ABI: A supported
dynamic linker, a GNU linker of sufficient vintage to understand
demangled C++ name globbing (ld) or the Sun linker, a shared
executable compiled
with g++, and shared libraries (libgcc_s, libstdc++) compiled by
a compiler (g++) with a compatible ABI. Phew.
On top of all that, an additional constraint: libstdc++ did not
attempt to version symbols (or age gracefully, really) until
version 3.1.0.
Most modern GNU/Linux and BSD versions, particularly ones using
GCC 3.1 and later, will meet the
requirements above, as does Solaris 2.5 and up.
Configuring
It turns out that most of the configure options that change
default behavior will impact the mangled names of exported
symbols, and thus impact versioning and compatibility.
For more information on configure options, including ABI
impacts, see:
here
There is one flag that explicitly deals with symbol versioning:
--enable-symvers.
In particular, libstdc++-v3/acinclude.m4 has a macro called
GLIBCXX_ENABLE_SYMVERS that defaults to yes (or the argument
passed in via --enable-symvers=foo). At that point, the macro
attempts to make sure that all the requirement for symbol
versioning are in place. For more information, please consult
acinclude.m4.
Checking Active
When the GNU C++ library is being built with symbol versioning
on, you should see the following at configure time for
libstdc++ (showing either 'gnu' or another of the supported styles):
checking versioning on shared library symbols... gnu
If you don't see this line in the configure output, or if this line
appears but the last word is 'no', then you are out of luck.
If the compiler is pre-installed, a quick way to test is to compile
the following (or any) simple C++ file and link it to the shared
libstdc++ library:
#include <iostream>
int main()
{ std::cout << "hello" << std::endl; return 0; }
%g++ hello.cc -o hello.out
%ldd hello.out
libstdc++.so.5 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 (0x00764000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/libm.so.6 (0x004a8000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /mnt/hd/bld/gcc/gcc/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x40016000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x0036d000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00355000)
%nm hello.out
If you see symbols in the resulting output with "GLIBCXX_3" as part
of the name, then the executable is versioned. Here's an example:
U _ZNSt8ios_base4InitC1Ev@@GLIBCXX_3.4
On Solaris 2, you can use pvs -r instead:
%g++ hello.cc -o hello.out
%pvs -r hello.out
libstdc++.so.6 (GLIBCXX_3.4, GLIBCXX_3.4.12);
libgcc_s.so.1 (GCC_3.0);
libc.so.1 (SUNWprivate_1.1, SYSVABI_1.3);
ldd -v works too, but is very verbose.
Allowed Changes
The following will cause the library minor version number to
increase, say from "libstdc++.so.3.0.4" to "libstdc++.so.3.0.5".
Adding an exported global or static data memberAdding an exported function, static or non-virtual member functionAdding an exported symbol or symbols by additional instantiations
Other allowed changes are possible.
Prohibited Changes
The following non-exhaustive list will cause the library major version
number to increase, say from "libstdc++.so.3.0.4" to
"libstdc++.so.4.0.0".
Changes in the gcc/g++ compiler ABIChanging size of an exported symbolChanging alignment of an exported symbolChanging the layout of an exported symbolChanging mangling on an exported symbolDeleting an exported symbolChanging the inheritance properties of a type by adding or removing
base classes
Changing the size, alignment, or layout of types
specified in the C++ standard. These may not necessarily be
instantiated or otherwise exported in the library binary, and
include all the required locale facets, as well as things like
std::basic_streambuf, et al.
Adding an explicit copy constructor or destructor to a
class that would otherwise have implicit versions. This will change
the way the compiler deals with this class in by-value return
statements or parameters: instead of passing instances of this
class in registers, the compiler will be forced to use memory. See the
section on Function
Calling Conventions and APIs
of the C++ ABI documentation for further details.
Implementation
Separation of interface and implementation
This is accomplished by two techniques that separate the API from
the ABI: forcing undefined references to link against a library
binary for definitions.
Include files have declarations, source files have defines
For non-templatized types, such as much of class
locale, the appropriate standard C++ include, say
locale, can contain full declarations, while
various source files (say locale.cc, locale_init.cc,
localename.cc) contain definitions.
Extern template on required types
For parts of the standard that have an explicit list of
required instantiations, the GNU extension syntax extern
template can be used to control where template
definitions reside. By marking required instantiations as
extern template in include files, and providing
explicit instantiations in the appropriate instantiation files,
non-inlined template functions can be versioned. This technique
is mostly used on parts of the standard that require
char and wchar_t instantiations, and
includes basic_string, the locale facets, and the
types in iostreams.
In addition, these techniques have the additional benefit that they
reduce binary size, which can increase runtime performance.
Namespaces linking symbol definitions to export mapfiles
All symbols in the shared library binary are processed by a
linker script at build time that either allows or disallows
external linkage. Because of this, some symbols, regardless of
normal C/C++ linkage, are not visible. Symbols that are internal
have several appealing characteristics: by not exporting the
symbols, there are no relocations when the shared library is
started and thus this makes for faster runtime loading
performance by the underlying dynamic loading mechanism. In
addition, they have the possibility of changing without impacting
ABI compatibility.
The following namespaces are transformed by the mapfile:namespace std Defaults to exporting all symbols in label
GLIBCXX that do not begin with an underscore, i.e.,
__test_func would not be exported by default. Select
exceptional symbols are allowed to be visible.namespace __gnu_cxx Defaults to not exporting any symbols in label
GLIBCXX, select items are allowed to be visible.namespace __gnu_internal Defaults to not exported, no items are allowed to be visible.namespace __cxxabiv1, aliased to namespace abi Defaults to not exporting any symbols in label
CXXABI, select items are allowed to be visible.Freezing the APIDisallowed changes, as above, are not made on a stable release
branch. Enforcement tends to be less strict with GNU extensions that
standard includes.TestingSingle ABI Testing
Testing for GNU C++ ABI changes is composed of two distinct
areas: testing the C++ compiler (g++) for compiler changes, and
testing the C++ library (libstdc++) for library changes.
Testing the C++ compiler ABI can be done various ways.
One. Intel ABI checker.
Two.
The second is yet unreleased, but has been announced on the gcc
mailing list. It is yet unspecified if these tools will be freely
available, and able to be included in a GNU project. Please contact
Mark Mitchell (mark@codesourcery.com) for more details, and current
status.
Three.
Involves using the vlad.consistency test framework. This has also been
discussed on the gcc mailing lists.
Testing the C++ library ABI can also be done various ways.
One.
(Brendan Kehoe, Jeff Law suggestion to run 'make check-c++' two ways,
one with a new compiler and an old library, and the other with an old
compiler and a new library, and look for testsuite regressions)
Details on how to set this kind of test up can be found here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-08/msg00142.html
Two.
Use the 'make check-abi' rule in the libstdc++ Makefile.
This is a proactive check of the library ABI. Currently, exported symbol
names that are either weak or defined are checked against a last known
good baseline. Currently, this baseline is keyed off of 3.4.0
binaries, as this was the last time the .so number was incremented. In
addition, all exported names are demangled, and the exported objects
are checked to make sure they are the same size as the same object in
the baseline.
Notice that each baseline is relative to a default
configured library and compiler: in particular, if options such as
--enable-clocale, or --with-cpu, in case of multilibs, are used at
configure time, the check may fail, either because of substantive
differences or because of limitations of the current checking
machinery.
This dataset is insufficient, yet a start. Also needed is a
comprehensive check for all user-visible types part of the standard
library for sizeof() and alignof() changes.
Verifying compatible layouts of objects is not even attempted. It
should be possible to use sizeof, alignof, and offsetof to compute
offsets for each structure and type in the standard library, saving to
another datafile. Then, compute this in a similar way for new
binaries, and look for differences.
Another approach might be to use the -fdump-class-hierarchy flag to
get information. However, currently this approach gives insufficient
data for use in library testing, as class data members, their offsets,
and other detailed data is not displayed with this flag.
(See PR g++/7470 on how this was used to find bugs.)
Perhaps there are other C++ ABI checkers. If so, please notify
us. We'd like to know about them!
Multiple ABI Testing
A "C" application, dynamically linked to two shared libraries, liba,
libb. The dependent library liba is a C++ shared library compiled with
GCC 3.3, and uses io, exceptions, locale, etc. The dependent library
libb is a C++ shared library compiled with GCC 3.4, and also uses io,
exceptions, locale, etc.
As above, libone is constructed as follows:
%$bld/H-x86-gcc-3.4.0/bin/g++ -fPIC -DPIC -c a.cc
%$bld/H-x86-gcc-3.4.0/bin/g++ -shared -Wl,-soname -Wl,libone.so.1 -Wl,-O1 -Wl,-z,defs a.o -o libone.so.1.0.0
%ln -s libone.so.1.0.0 libone.so
%$bld/H-x86-gcc-3.4.0/bin/g++ -c a.cc
%ar cru libone.a a.o
And, libtwo is constructed as follows:
%$bld/H-x86-gcc-3.3.3/bin/g++ -fPIC -DPIC -c b.cc
%$bld/H-x86-gcc-3.3.3/bin/g++ -shared -Wl,-soname -Wl,libtwo.so.1 -Wl,-O1 -Wl,-z,defs b.o -o libtwo.so.1.0.0
%ln -s libtwo.so.1.0.0 libtwo.so
%$bld/H-x86-gcc-3.3.3/bin/g++ -c b.cc
%ar cru libtwo.a b.o
...with the resulting libraries looking like
%ldd libone.so.1.0.0
libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x40016000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/libm.so.6 (0x400fa000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /mnt/hd/bld/gcc/gcc/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x4011c000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x40125000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00355000)
%ldd libtwo.so.1.0.0
libstdc++.so.5 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 (0x40027000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/libm.so.6 (0x400e1000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /mnt/hd/bld/gcc/gcc/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x40103000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x4010c000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00355000)
Then, the "C" compiler is used to compile a source file that uses
functions from each library.
gcc test.c -g -O2 -L. -lone -ltwo /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6
Which gives the expected:
%ldd a.out
libstdc++.so.5 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 (0x00764000)
libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x40015000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x0036d000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/libm.so.6 (0x004a8000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /mnt/hd/bld/gcc/gcc/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x400e5000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00355000)
This resulting binary, when executed, will be able to safely use
code from both liba, and the dependent libstdc++.so.6, and libb,
with the dependent libstdc++.so.5.
Outstanding Issues
Some features in the C++ language make versioning especially
difficult. In particular, compiler generated constructs such as
implicit instantiations for templates, typeinfo information, and
virtual tables all may cause ABI leakage across shared library
boundaries. Because of this, mixing C++ ABIs is not recommended at
this time.
For more background on this issue, see these bugzilla entries:
24660: versioning weak symbols in libstdc++
19664: libstdc++ headers should have pop/push of the visibility around the declarations
Bibliography
ABIcheck
Itanium C++ ABI
Intel Compilers for Linux: Compatibility with GNU Compilers
Linker and Libraries Guide (document 819-0690)
Sun Studio 11: C++ Migration Guide (document 819-3689)
How to Write Shared Libraries
UlrichDrepper
C++ ABI for the ARM Architecture
Dynamic Shared Objects: Survey and Issues
ISO C++ J16/06-0046
BenjaminKosnik
Versioning With Namespaces
ISO C++ J16/06-0083
BenjaminKosnik
Binary Compatibility of Shared Libraries Implemented in C++
on GNU/Linux Systems
SYRCoSE 2009
PavelShvedDenisSilakov